927 条评价
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Ulfric,3 年前This was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Case_Of,3 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Echonly,3 年前I uninstalled this extension after using it for more than a day. The default rules have caused me a lot of trouble when browsing the web, and there is no way to set detailed settings.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 22jjjnn,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 SlyArcher,3 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17394022,3 年前This ends up breaking several non tracking urls as they sometimes inject history state for functionality.
And the extension doesn't provide a single way to add exceptions and by viewing the github it seems they just plain ignore suggestions.
There is a setting called "The url to the data.json file (rules)" but this does nothing as changing it to several different things still worked in the exact same way.
If you don't use pages that may modify or rely on the url consistency is a great extension but besides that it missing a critical feature. - 评分 3 / 5来自 Frans,3 年前This was breaking links from loading, and since this is a "install and forget" type of extension--which is nice, except in this instance--and since there is no link whitelisting, I unfortunately have to disable it. :(
- 评分 2 / 5来自 aconamos,3 年前This extension works great other than that it has completely broken google OAuth for me. I have had to disable it which sucks because I really like this extension.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Midnight1,3 年前This add on is bugging as hell, blocks some web sites from loading.
Took me a week to figure out what the problem was.
Disable it and all is well.
I uninstalled it!! - 评分 4 / 5来自 Mister GothFvck,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Soulsurfer,3 年前ein äußerst nützliches Add-on, arbeitet unauffällig im Hintergrund und erledigt genau das, was die Entwickler versprechen!
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14108734,3 年前Need the ability to WHITELIST certain URLS. It is either on, or off. And when it breaks a website, I have to turn it off completely. Add this please!
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Arash Yoosefdoost,3 年前The new version causes many problems. For example, it broke Firefox's back and forward buttons in Gmail. Makes Gmail's unique email links invalid and the page will be redirected to the inbox in case of refreshing. It is a new problem.
In addition, it broke many websites such as banks. Also, prevent plugins such as Boomerang to connect to the Gmail account and broke them.
It was a good Firefox add-on but now cases many serious issues. - 评分 5 / 5来自 WildSnakeNYC,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 moneywiseUpfront,3 年前If Google removed the extension from the Chrome Web Store... Then ClearURLs does its job well.
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12370795,3 年前A whitelist would have been great.
But the main issue is that it breaks so many website that most of the time I leave it disabled. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13938515,3 年前Some URLs doesn't work with last release 1.24.1 when they worked with previous release. Must deactivate ClearURLs to access these URLs. Not terrific.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Dareal Bingoxz,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 tonini,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Aly,3 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13202285,3 年前Great extension, but it needs a whitelist. Payment portals are sometimes broken.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Adolf.Markl@gmx.de,3 年前Was ist mit "fbclid=" + "gclid=" ?
Vorschlag: einzeln An/Aus für jede Klasse dieser Tracks (utm_.*, fbcl.*=, gclid=, ...)?
außerdem: Whitelist wäre wünschenswert. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Mingo,3 年前