Don't "Accept" image/webp 的评价
Don't "Accept" image/webp 作者： jscher2000
jscher2000 的回应
开发者回应
发布于 2 年前You can test using https://i2.wp.com/radical-mag.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/@Test-BMW-320d-8.jpg -- normally, if you hover your mouse over the tab, it will say it is a WEBP image; with the extension enabled, it should be a JPG image.
If it doesn't work on that one, check whether it's the private window issue: https://support.mozilla.org/kb/extensions-private-browsing
If you want to send me some problem URLs, you can create an issue at https://github.com/jscher2000/dont-accept-webp/issues or email me at jscher2000@outlook.com.
If it doesn't work on that one, check whether it's the private window issue: https://support.mozilla.org/kb/extensions-private-browsing
If you want to send me some problem URLs, you can create an issue at https://github.com/jscher2000/dont-accept-webp/issues or email me at jscher2000@outlook.com.
138 条评价
开发者回应
发布于 2 个月前Hi, sites decide what format to serve based on different criteria. This extension only changes the "Accept" header. Some sites check the user agent instead (to see whether it's a modern browser). If you had the problem with a post on the Community tab of a YouTube channel, I see it, too. I don't think Google offers those images in alternate formats. (If I try to download one using the Internet Explorer 11 user agent, I still get WebP.)- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18285487，2 个月前Great idea. Lossless WebP is generally a superior alternative to Png (except it cannot handle HQs beyond 16k on a side), but when you get served a webp on a web site, there is a 95% chance it is just a Jpg that has gone through another round of lossy compression, a different type, at a lower bit rate = worse quality (fewer fine details).
In an ideal world, the digital master would be encoded as both Jpg/Png and Jxl, and the browser would have an option built in to preference one format over the other. JpegXl is the best new format. Jpeg2000 was decent but I don't think any browsers support it, and it even has a lossless format. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Dan，5 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 oguz，5 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Shela，8 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Major Gear，9 个月前This addon installs easily and does what it says on the tin. I recommend this addon.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 11803080，9 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18347256，10 个月前Extremely useful and efficient, now I can save an image in it's original jpg or png format, instead of paying 2 conversions jpg-webp then webp-jpg. Should be the default when saving a jpg or png image.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Asmodeus，10 个月前this is one of the most convenient and helpful add-on in the world, it made my life so much easier when using Reddit and is the sole reason I switched to Firefox.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Eru，1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14506206，1 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 CodeIcannot，1 年前After using this add-on for a long time, I'm only giving it 3 stars, because it's very unclear to me, if it's actually accomplishing anything...? There are lots of sites that keep pushing webp and avif files, even when this add-on is in use, and it feels like the number of those sites is increasing, all the time.
开发者回应
发布于 1 年前Unfortunately, this add-ons is only effective on sites that pay attention to the "Accept" header. Other users have identified certain sites that ignore the change made by this add-on, such as NexusMods and PlayStation. These sites either no longer support legacy browsers, or require a legacy user agent (such as Internet Explorer 11) before sending legacy media formats. For cases like that, you could consider using a converter. I have one here on the Add-ons site called "Save webP as PNG or JPEG." - 评分 1 / 5来自 Andrew，1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 sabrelion，1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16974979，1 年前I am so annoyed by the webp format as someone who collects art references on the internet for private use, and no reference program supports webp. Webp is a scourge on the internet and I am glad this plugin exists.