I2P In Private Browsing 的评价
I2P In Private Browsing 作者: idk
idk 的回应
开发者回应
发布于 2 年前Hi Qubes.
I can't change what version of IceCat ParrotOS packages. I'm not in charge of what they do. If you force it to be installed in a lower Firefox version than what I officially support, I am not responsible for the consequences. Firefox plays nice with the sandbox in newer versions. I suggest you update.
Of course it overrides automatic proxy configuration. It's whole job is to override the proxy configuration for the container tab. If you're hell-bent on nonstandard configuration, then this isn't the extension for you.
As I told you on zzz's forum, there is absolutely nothing I can do about CDN's testing for privacy.resistFingerprinting and blocking people who use it. That is Amazon's fault, not mine. The alternative, *disabling* privacy.resistFingerprinting, is much worse. As I said, I won't endanger other users just because you are having issues with a CDN.
I may make an effort to be more compatible with I2P+, but your other three issues are just as ill-concieved and non-actionable as they were on zzz.i2p.
Previous discussion: http://zzz.i2p/topics/3379-i2p-in-private-browsing-firefox-add-on
I can't change what version of IceCat ParrotOS packages. I'm not in charge of what they do. If you force it to be installed in a lower Firefox version than what I officially support, I am not responsible for the consequences. Firefox plays nice with the sandbox in newer versions. I suggest you update.
Of course it overrides automatic proxy configuration. It's whole job is to override the proxy configuration for the container tab. If you're hell-bent on nonstandard configuration, then this isn't the extension for you.
As I told you on zzz's forum, there is absolutely nothing I can do about CDN's testing for privacy.resistFingerprinting and blocking people who use it. That is Amazon's fault, not mine. The alternative, *disabling* privacy.resistFingerprinting, is much worse. As I said, I won't endanger other users just because you are having issues with a CDN.
I may make an effort to be more compatible with I2P+, but your other three issues are just as ill-concieved and non-actionable as they were on zzz.i2p.
Previous discussion: http://zzz.i2p/topics/3379-i2p-in-private-browsing-firefox-add-on