Mendeley Web Importer 的评价
Mendeley Web Importer 作者: Mendeley
463 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Linchuan Chen, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16802469, 4 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 chanda ireen, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16785317, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Dr. Pravin, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16734390, 4 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Benyamin Limanto, 4 年前This tools is good, but the problem is simple, it keep at poping up a tab and that cause problem for me. I think my computer get virus, but after looking at the URL, It's elsevier URL so yeah... It's mendeley...
UPDATE : Please create the ability via background tab or API, using pop up is unacceptable tbh.. it's bad for UI...开发者回应
发布于 4 年前Thanks for your feedback. This is indeed our "silent" login, which is clearly not silent enough!
We are actually looking to update how we log in in the near future so you won't have to see this screen pop up anymore, I hope this helps! - 评分 1 / 5来自 Aleksandr Andreev, 4 年前Seems to be fairly useless. Cannot correctly parse the information about papers on Google Scholar, elibrary, JSTOR, Academia, or any other sites.
开发者回应
发布于 4 年前I'm sorry to hear about these problems, Aleksandr. Google Scholar should be quite accurate, it would be really useful to know exactly which pages are having this problem? Google Scholar is one of our most used sites, so it would be good to know of any problems with it.
I had a look at the rest that you mentioned. eLibrary looks to work well with the extension, although if you have pages where it doesn't work it would be good to get them. JSTOR and Academia seem to have similar problems: our extension looks for identifiers on the page (DOIs, ISSNs and the like) and uses that to get metadata and PDFs. JSTOR and Academia do not appear to have them. However, we do have entity identifiers which can clearly be improved for these pages, I'll report them to our developers.
Thanks for reaching out! - 评分 3 / 5来自 Jenifer Sia, 4 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16258965, 4 年前This new version of Mendeley makes accessing online papers is more complicated and less intuitive than the previous version.
开发者回应
发布于 4 年前I'm sorry to hear you feel this way, it would be really useful to know how and why the newer version is more complicated and less intuitive than the previous one, so we can improve the newer version to match your expectations of the older version? - 评分 5 / 5来自 Mohamad El Ghoche, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 PAULA SCHONS VIECELI, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Christian Cayobit, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16720622, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14414957, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Silas Davy, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Wendtoen Denise, 4 年前