Speed dial 2 的评价
Speed dial 2 作者: Browser extensions
477 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14704507,6 年前A must have to manage bookmarks on Firefox or Chrome, very useful also to access to the recent closed tabs ! The synchronisation works well for a litle cost. Congratz to the dev.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Young Insane,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14699698,6 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14701541,6 年前This is by and far the most underrated speed dial extension. I've used this on Chrome for as long as I can remember and it's the only one which I would truly call "minimalistic". The free version already gives you most of what you need unless you require some extra convenience. Well done to the developer.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14680630,6 年前BLOATware/ADware - new AI "feature" sells your search data. BE CAREFUL!! also deleted all my bookmarks. Way to mess up a decent extension. SHAM
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14337524,6 年前WOW, Thank you for coming back to Firefox!!, i cant live without it!!
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13820218,6 年前1) My bookmarks are not in the private window. Make sure that the private window Dials were the same as in normal mode. 2) When creating a new tab, thumbnails with bookmarks (Dials) are loaded for a long time.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14456243,6 年前I'm sick of losing settings and having to set this up again. Not impressed by the permissions list either!
- 评分 4 / 5来自 randomofamber,6 年前Good, but the biggest thumbnail is small even width set to 95% (maximum) of screen width... I would like to have bigger thumbnail...
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Bennos tf2,6 年前I love this extension and want to support the developer with small donation
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Peter Agnew,6 年前I have used this extension exclusively for many years. As a Systems Administrator I have found it to be extremely convenient, easy to use, time saving, and secure. I use it in all the browsers I use. It saves having re-enter all of your favorite sites each time you switch browsers or work on someone else's computer. I've tried many alternatives, but I always return to Speeddial2. I recommend it for all of my users.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 5699210,6 年前Been using this app for years. Love it, I feel naked when I install a new browser without it.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14072894,6 年前All rights reserved with a bunch of overwhelming permissions required, r u crazy???
- 评分 5 / 5来自 DocFallingApart,6 年前Best speed dial extension out there. Sync is great and just works like it should. I've been using it for years and couldn't live without it.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14494190,6 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14478479,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14451950,6 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13763182,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Ilia Roisman,6 年前I have used Speed Dial 2 during last year. Now, after the recent Mozilla update I have lost all my speed-dial-settings. I think I will move to another browser and will stop using speed-dial. Disappointing
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14438745,6 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 rafikiphoto,6 年前I have used this extension for years but recently there seems to be zero support. There is an annoying bug I see in this Firefox version which I have reported several times but have had no reply. So sad. I have never been a fan of the alternatives but I am actively testing them now.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14420707,6 年前Bin leider durch Firefox gezwungen von Speeddial auf Speeddial 2 umzusteigen. Während Speeddial noch sehr einfach und intuitiv zu bedienen war ist dies mit der 2er Version nicht mehr möglich. Kein Kontextmenu mehr da um die Webadressen den Kurzwahlen zuzuordnen. Auch sonst keine Möglichkeit in den Einstellungen des Add-on. So ist das für mich nicht brauchbar. Das gilt für den Browser Firefox auch. Nach jahrelanger zufriedener Nutzung ist jetzt soviel verschlimmbessert worden daß mir der Spaß an der Nutzung vergangen ist. Andere Mütter haben auch schöne Töchter... und Tschuß Firefox...
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14395843,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14400988,6 年前Worthless in Android FF 62.0.3:
1. installed it without having a user account in SpeedDial2.com
at end of walkthrough setup a bunch of triggers...
Good!
Open new tab...
FF's "speed dial, limited" opens, instead of this extension...
So, I try arbitrarily opening the addon itself...
moz-extension://e9a2d5db-0de7-4300-ab3a-856f2f10c38f/menu.html
is the uri I get,
"saving..." is what the page says...
Of course, it doesn't work.
Figuring that if it was "saving", then it had to be saving /somewhere/,
so maybe it was needing me to have an account for it to work?
So, I registered on their site...
And tried again.
2. same result.
3. I went on their site, tried finding support, was pointed to the "forum",
so I tried telling them...
OK, so now I am not allowed to paste that uri into the forum textbox,...
Oh, I'm not allowed to post ANYthing because registering on their site doesn't register me in their forum, & they want access to my Google account for me to register on their forum??
Further, when I tried
install AGAIN, set up lots of triggers at end of walkthrough, & then immediately export...
I discovered it was saving lots of information about my browsing that it had no business saving...
AND yet more, it supposedly can allow the buttons to be moved, but in Android FF 62 that is false: nothing can move them, so one would have to write down all the buttons, sort them on paper, delete them all, and then put them in in-order, IF the thing worked, in the 1st place.
DO NOT USE, IF IN ANDROID/FF.
To SD2.com, you may have merely been careless ( if any of the privacy-settings or privacy-plugins I added blocked your addon from working, then your non-communicating of what your extension needs to work breaks your worth in the actual market ),
but the bogus forum "help" is not worth bothering with.
ANYONE who wants to molest my accounts, in order for me to be participating in theirs,
no matter how "fashionable" or "acceptable" molesting is, nowadays, that crosses the line.
Do Not ask to get in anyone's account, if you want to be trustworthy.
Period.
To anyone who disagrees with ANYthing in my review, just report it as abuse, & get it removed:
obviously, my opinion isn't common, and if uncommon, it /must/ be abuse, right?
So, obliterate it, for conformity's regime.
Cheers.