NoScript 安全套件 的评价
NoScript 安全套件 作者: Giorgio Maone
Firefox 用户 10919506 的评价
评分 3 / 5
来自 Firefox 用户 10919506, 8 年前"To all the people complaining about the new UI (not that I expect any of them to see this): Giorgio can't revert back to the old UI because that kind of UI is no longer supported on Firefox 57 and above. Nice things like native drop-down menus and dialog boxes are no longer allowed. Those were part of XUL addons. Now we only have WebExtensions add-ons à la Chrome, and if you know Chrome, you know that its add-on interface situation is the same. "Nice" UIs have been prohibited by Mozilla, on purpose, so your gripe is with them, not with Giorgio, the developer of this add-on.
I do agree that the UI could use some work anyway, though, in terms of understandability, ease of use, and looks. But this is still an early version which had to be released in a rush, so give it a while.
I'll still deduct one star from my previous rating because too much comfort functionality is missing at the moment. Temporary exceptions, selective and site-wide, were one of my most-used features of NoScript, and they're not in yet. Also, the options screen is severely lacking, a lot of the behaviour I used to customise can't be changed right now. I assume that all of these things are still possible, and just haven't been implemented yet. Part of that blame, once again, can be put on Mozilla for their hasty and clumsy shutdown of XUL extensions and the rushed und grossly unfinished transition to WebExtensions, which is making life hard for all add-on developers."
Word.
I do agree that the UI could use some work anyway, though, in terms of understandability, ease of use, and looks. But this is still an early version which had to be released in a rush, so give it a while.
I'll still deduct one star from my previous rating because too much comfort functionality is missing at the moment. Temporary exceptions, selective and site-wide, were one of my most-used features of NoScript, and they're not in yet. Also, the options screen is severely lacking, a lot of the behaviour I used to customise can't be changed right now. I assume that all of these things are still possible, and just haven't been implemented yet. Part of that blame, once again, can be put on Mozilla for their hasty and clumsy shutdown of XUL extensions and the rushed und grossly unfinished transition to WebExtensions, which is making life hard for all add-on developers."
Word.
2,369 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 19047433, 2 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 A. Bilmanda, 4 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Lazer Bear, 4 天前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15056996, 23 天前issues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17847461, 1 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18989716, 1 个月前
- I really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - 评分 5 / 5来自 LittleFire, 1 个月前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18920843, 1 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18315395, 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Retromania, 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Luciano Rangel, 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18924473, 2 个月前