NoScript 安全套件 的评价
NoScript 安全套件 作者: Giorgio Maone
2,297 条评价
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Rykum,7 年前Updating my review, now it's works under private tab. UI still needs some work but now it is more clear.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13509230,7 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Rob Kent,7 年前Firstly let me say that I am a long time user of NoScript and I have sent monetary contributions to the developer at least once, possibly more often. It is a *free* addon that obviously takes many hours of work to maintain. The developer should be given thanks and respect for doing that voluntarily. No self-respecting developer sets out to make mistakes or produce something that users don't want.
So something has gone badly wrong with this release. There are two aspects to it that I can see: the script blocking operation, and the UI. Some sites that I visited no longer work with NoScript enabled, even if you allow everything. Amazon music (play sample) didn't work for me, just one example. So that needs sorting out.
As for the UI, I initially found it complicated and confusing but I am getting used to it now. What happened to the middle-click functionality?
But until the developer has managed to fix the functionality, I have to disable it. I may just end up using the Brave browser until it is fixed.
Oh, and I would like a way to save my Whitelist so that I don't lose it if I uninstall and reinstall. - 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 10244801,7 年前Most of what is happening now you should blame on Mozilla, though I have to admit there are several things I don't get with NS' new interface.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 ravendust,7 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13512679,7 年前Thanks! Works for me so far. One thing I found a bit tricky is that if one allows a script from a non-https site but without also allowing non-https from the site by clicking on the padlock, then reloading will show the site as "Default", i.e. most of the time as blocked. So it seems as if the allowing of the site was not remembered by no script. I think it would be better to show the site as allowed as one has chosen before since the padlock will give you the further information that it does only allow non-https.
I have seen lots of people saying that no script does not save allowed sites. So far for me the workaround was always to unlock the padlock as well. - 评分 4 / 5来自 GringoTM,7 年前Ottima Estensione fa quello che dice, purchè si capisca come lavora e la si configuri correttamente.
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Franz Schneider,7 年前This was a five-star add-on prior! I LOVED it! What happened to the user interface and the options panel with all of its features? This add-on is a mess now.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13512395,7 年前Bisogna un po' abituarsi alla nuova interfaccia. Come al solito la pazienza degli utenti non e' un gran che "tutto e subito" imparate ad usarlo e controllate se funziona correttamente a me funziona egregiamente e mi sono gia abituato al nuovo look.
A una cosa dato che e' gratuito se non vi comoda cambiate pure componente aggiuntivo credo che Giorgio sopravvivera'.
TNX. - 评分 2 / 5来自 frede_256,7 年前Even as a long time user of NoScript this UI absolutely kills the experience.
I still think there is hope though. Something as little as getting the mouse-over menu activation to work would make it feel not nearly as bad.
The new HTTPS detection is also one of the greatest offenders in breaking website functionality and there isn't even a proper explanation for how or why it works. I had to experiment my way to discovering this. - 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13512313,7 年前Why does it suck so hard now? It was a good add-on and one of the reasons I use Firefox. Think i give Opera a chance.
Since 10.1.2 Temporarly button is back; it's getting better again. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13511675,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Nicholas Valentine,7 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 JP,7 年前Was having a lot of trouble with it at first. The noscript button was working for a bit, then stopped working which may have been due to a FF update as far as I could tell on the noscript site? Restarting the browser fixed that particular issue but other things weren't working.
I removed noscript from the add-ons and then went to https://noscript.net/getit and installed from there and it seems to have fixed a majority of the problems as well as cleaned up the UI a bit. I suggest everyone give that a try as well. Just seems there's still bugs to work out and I'm glad to continue to stick with it. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Welker,7 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13510381,7 年前Used it for Years.
The new Version doesn't work properly.
UMatrix is an alternative. - 评分 2 / 5来自 radiofree,7 年前Alla fine ho deciso di fare un downgrade alla ultyima versione fi Firefox 56.
Con la v.10 di Noscipt , a parte della complicazione del nuovo menú, molte pagine non caricano correctamente incluso se si permette JavaScript globalmente. Chissa la nuova API non permette il ritorno all'interfaccia calssica?
Spero poter tornare ad usare Nocript prossimamente perche è chiaro che non sarà sicuro continuare con FF 56,02 a lungo.
Grazie comunque per i'ottima estensione che è stata fino a pochi gg fà. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13499217,7 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13509908,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13509901,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13509806,7 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13509796,7 年前I understood the previous version of NoScript.
I do not understand this version. It is not clear what is going on, or what the icon colours mean. Red versus green seems to be disconnected from permitted and not permitted.
I need documentation. The alternative in the latest version of FireFox is uMatrix, which I have on one machine. It is Very Complicated, but I did find complete documentation for it.
To use NoScript 10.1.1 or later I must have documentation.