Page Saver WE screenshot capture tool 的评价
Page Saver WE screenshot capture tool 作者: Kathleen Brade, Mark Smith
83 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14499133,6 年前This replaces Abduction! as my go-to page image saver. I'm glad at least the concept of full-page image capture has survived the transition to WebExtensions.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Jim Gregory,6 年前Does not appear to work on Firefox for Android. A new tab opens when taking a screenshot but the tab is blank. (I'd include a screenshot of the blank tab but I can't do that ☺️)
- 评分 5 / 5来自 mrez.ir,6 年前Very nice and simple design and could be better if had option to choose image format on its button menu.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13671473,6 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Adrien,6 年前Très bien mais il manquerait une limitation du nombre de caractères du titre "%t" (afin de prévenir la limitation Windows des noms trop longs) et le format PDF.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14278727,6 年前I use it whenever I need to remember online data. Very flexible and real time saver.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14208137,6 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 BarrySoetoro,6 年前Thank you . . . Kathleen Brade and Mark Smith for a wonderfully implemented add-on that does as you stated it would without any surprises or crashes. Finally, someone managed to build a screenshot-er that simply takes a perfect PNG/JPG snapshot and puts it where you tell it to after automatically, properly naming the image in accordance with the url/page title. Couldn't want an app to do it any better than Pagesaver WE!
Haven't tried JPG's yet because historically, PNG takes and renders the best images for such things as a very long website page, and your app completes that task very well, the best I've ever tried so far, and I've tried every available, in-browser screenshot-er app that's come along for many years.
A personal pref on this: Not that you'd mess things up, but I just don't see how this could be improved, its absolutely perfect! - hence, I'm afraid to update since this version simply because it seems like apps, usually through no fault of the creators, just inherently go awry because of browser conflict. So, I'll keep updating Waterfox and leaving this BEAUTY alone until the two become incompatible and I'm forced to update?
THANK YOU BOTH SO MUCH! - 评分 4 / 5来自 Crick,7 年前Hey, thanks for creating Page Saver WE — not quite up to the 5-stars of Pearl Crescent though.
BEST feature of Pearl was setting resolution.
NEED resolution setting in Page Saver WE.
Can resolution setting like Pearl Crescent had be added to Page Saver WE??
Crick - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firebreathing,7 年前Thank you for this excellent extension. It works very well in almost all situations.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 mtomo,7 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Zaphod Beebledoc,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13758630,7 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13710974,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12458171,7 年前Page Saver is the finest page- or image-saving extension that I've ever seen, by a pretty good margin. Simpler, smoother, more effective, and considerably more flexible than most other browser grab-oids.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Pollux,7 年前1° With this page : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/pagesaver-we/, i have the error : "Unable to capture page: internal browser pages cannot be captured" !?
2° it misses the ability to save as pdf instead of png or jpeg, as with pdfit (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pdfit/)开发者回应
发布于 7 年前The "internal browser pages cannot be captured" message is caused by Mozilla's restrictions that prevent add-ons from accessing certain pages, including those at addons.mozilla.org (we plan to improve the error message).
Since most modern operating systems provide a "print to PDF" feature, we do not plan to add that capability to Page Saver. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13619896,7 年前It captures the whole page. There is an option preference to always save in a jpg to save file size rather than a png format.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 6696096,7 年前I loved the Pearl Crescent addon before FF57, but WE version is lacking some features:
1) capture the page without visual scrolling ***
2) use hotkey for capturing ***
3) save to Downloads\SUBFOLDER (like Downloads\PageSaver or something user-defined) ***
4) automatic filename increment postfix on name collision (instead of file overwrite) ***
5) some kind of solution to capturing of the fixed elements - for example the fixed footer panel (position:fixed; bottom: 0;) on "https://modnakasta.ua" is repeated on every scroll, instead of being drawn in the actual position (bottom: 0; in this case) or only once (as Screengrab addon does)
The features marked with *** were present in former versions of Pearl Crescent addon and/or are present in current addons from other developers (like mentioned Screengrab addon).
But Page Saver WE works faster on long complicated pages! ;-) - 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13502162,7 年前Beaucoup plus compliqué que Pearl Crescent Page Server. Ne permet pas la copie d'une plage sélectionnée.
开发者回应
发布于 7 年前Please excuse my English response.
It is true that Page Saver WE does not yet include all of the features of our “classic” Page Saver, but we hope to improve it in the future. I am not sure what you mean by Page Saver WE being more complicated, so please let us know more via support@pearlcrescent.com. Thanks!