Privacy Possum 的评价
Privacy Possum 作者: cowlicks
414 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14345201, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14344019, 7 年前
- Sticking with Privacy Badger and alternative fingerprint blocking addons that are time tested. I don't really see the need for another redundant privacy tool that tries to be a catch all and not only isn't because that's too much to task a single addon with, but also isn't the best at doing one thing as is the philosophy of most of the EFF addons for example.
Not impressed at the moment. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14271873, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14325542, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14324634, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14319643, 7 年前Excellent ...et indispensanble.
m'a sauve la vie contre des pop up malware inbloquables avec anti virus ou anti malware !
Bravo et merci. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13160835, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14312779, 7 年前I'm enjoying the web much better with the Privacy Possum with no stressors now!
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14212475, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14307756, 7 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14281778, 7 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14290419, 7 年前Haven't been on it very long. So far, so good. May resubmit later.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14259190, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 The Beard Below My Chin, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14279693, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Zé Ribeiro, 7 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12370795, 7 年前Can you please say more about how your add-on is falsifying the data gathered by tracking companies. Does it modify any fingerprinting data?
If so is it compatible with the extension CanvasBlocker? Or does it do the same as CanvasBlocker.开发者回应
发布于 7 年前Hi KIMW, there is a more in depth explanation about how blocking fingerprinting works here: https://github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum#browser-fingerprinting
Please let me know if you have any further questions after reading that. That way I can clarify documentation to avoid confusion in the future.
Privacy Possum *should* be compatible with with CanvasBlocker. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Édouard Lopez, 7 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 LiaraTsoni, 7 年前Tell me WHY are you using a UI library for display a couple of checkboxes ? What it will be the next time ? A virtual machine ? An add-on has to be light and efficient com'on.
UPDATE :
Thx for your reply, I understand. But I'm not talking about the code size. The size doesn't really matter, I'm just need a couple of bytes for doing a infinite loop. Using a library take more CPU and memory than vanilla. Using it one time isn't really a problem, but when you have five add-ons with five dependencies each... Grrrr ! Anyway you're doing a good job, thanks for your add-on.开发者回应
发布于 7 年前Hi, thank you for your comment. I plan on using react later to expand the features the popup has. There have been quite a lot of requests for this. As well as an options page. I may switch to a smaller library in the future. Adding react also helped fix several UI bugs, and makes the current UI easier to build on.
FWIW, adding react only adds ~35kb to the packaged file, a %15 increase. Unpacked it is ~120kb. However the public suffix list, and multi-domain first party list combined are 160kb. So I didn't think it was a very significant size bump. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13230603, 7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14123273, 7 年前