Secure Password Generator 的评价
Secure Password Generator 作者： Nikolay Martynov
Firefox 用户 13366487 的评价
评分 4 / 5
来自 Firefox 用户 13366487， 7 年前Very handy, been using it for a few weeks and am relatively satisfied with this add-on.
However I think that there are 2 significant blunders or "rookie mistakes."
#1: enforcing a minimum count of a certain type of character. By using the up and down arrows, only a minimum of 2 can be selected. But a 0 (zero) can be manually entered, and should be, to maximize randomness and eliminate a bias. The outline should not be highlighted in red as if it's not a good thing to specify a minimum of 2 characters for a particular type of character.
#2: there is no explanation as to how the random characters are generated, how robust is the cryptographic process. True randomness is very difficult to generate. These passwords are probably good enough for log-in passwords, but what about for use with true encryption? If I need robust passwords for encryption I'd go to grc.com, packetizer.com, or use Keepass.
However I think that there are 2 significant blunders or "rookie mistakes."
#1: enforcing a minimum count of a certain type of character. By using the up and down arrows, only a minimum of 2 can be selected. But a 0 (zero) can be manually entered, and should be, to maximize randomness and eliminate a bias. The outline should not be highlighted in red as if it's not a good thing to specify a minimum of 2 characters for a particular type of character.
#2: there is no explanation as to how the random characters are generated, how robust is the cryptographic process. True randomness is very difficult to generate. These passwords are probably good enough for log-in passwords, but what about for use with true encryption? If I need robust passwords for encryption I'd go to grc.com, packetizer.com, or use Keepass.
62 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 退出党团队远离中共邪教， 5 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 敬念法轮大法好远离瘟疫， 2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Miroslav Sidorov， 5 个月前
- Very bad at generating passwords. I configured 20 symbols and set special symbols minimum 5. I got 4-5 occurances of the same special symbol almost every time. This is not ok!
Also, not enough options for generating passwords like: characters to be unique or maximum possibility of the same characters. Not possible to resize dialog if I want more than 20 characters. Sometimes 20 character password occupies more than default field space, but sometimes not. This is because wrong font is used which has variable character width and its not possible to configure normal font.
It is not clear what mean options: both hands, left hand, right hand.
If developer decides to fix issues, then I can change review stars. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18420504， 7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Malmst33n[RPM]， 2 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16931407， 4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 nospmisannah， 4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Saran Tanpituckpong， 5 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16033825， 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 blasphemousdreams， 5 年前I've been using this for a couple of years now. It makes it much easier to come up with passwords. You can determine how many characters, and what type of characters.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15586822， 5 年前Nifty! Amongst the variables one can choose which characters to include AND which characters to exclude. This is robust little calculator, wish the rest of the world would pay attention to what Martynov has done.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Wojciech Pawlik， 5 年前