Smart HTTPS 的评价
Smart HTTPS 作者: ilGur
Saverdun 的评价
Like a rollin' stone.
1- 'Smart HTTPS (revived)' is definitely faster than its non-WebExtension ancestor. It runs flawlessly here, first site analysis (when a site appears to not support https) appears to perform even faster than before and I've never encountered the 3 seconds default maximum delay before switching to http when applicable : it's very quickly understood by the add-on.
2- Time is on the side of 'Smart HTTPS' (revived or not but time will remain on its revived side) because more and more sites are shifting to https, this is notorious.
Hence, I've abandoned a well-known HTTPS approach, that of a listing, in favor of this approach (do it securely, return to non-secure if applicable and write it down to avoid further https quest) which seems more and more pertinent with... time.
1- 'Smart HTTPS (revived)' is definitely faster than its non-WebExtension ancestor. It runs flawlessly here, first site analysis (when a site appears to not support https) appears to perform even faster than before and I've never encountered the 3 seconds default maximum delay before switching to http when applicable : it's very quickly understood by the add-on.
2- Time is on the side of 'Smart HTTPS' (revived or not but time will remain on its revived side) because more and more sites are shifting to https, this is notorious.
Hence, I've abandoned a well-known HTTPS approach, that of a listing, in favor of this approach (do it securely, return to non-secure if applicable and write it down to avoid further https quest) which seems more and more pertinent with... time.
258 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14430802, 9 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 wavingdragon, 2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 IVAN DAVID MARIN MENDOZA, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17499918, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 MayinEllen, 4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Salman Hameed, 4 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Bill Mayhew, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15434003, 4 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Julio Varella, 4 年前