Stylish - Custom themes for any website 的评价
Stylish - Custom themes for any website 作者: userstyles.org
952 条评价
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13792258,6 年前https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Ricky,6 年前https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
This add-on is spyware. Stylus replicates its functionality and doesn't steal your browsing history. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/styl-us/ - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13030964,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13013082,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14135570,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Audrian,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 WarnerJan Veldhuis,6 年前Stay away from this extension. Stylish collects EVERYTHING the user does and sends it to their servers. See https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/ for a breakdown and more information. This add-on needs to be pulled as soon as possible!
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Nick K,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14135499,6 年前Stylish collects and transmits all your browsing behavior over the internet in order to analyze and sell this data. Have a look at 'Stylus' which is a fork of stylish without the invasive privacy infringements.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14135493,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 thm | Tomáš Mládek,6 年前https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- 评分 1 / 5来自 mDfRg,6 年前According to this:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/2-million-users-impacted-by-new-data-collection-policy-in-stylish-browser-add-on/
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/05/16/stylus-is-a-stylish-fork-without-analytics/
this plugin tracks your internet traffic. This cannot be tolerated - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13444090,6 年前According to this article the Stylish browser extension violates your privacy by sending your browser history to foreign servers
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
This cannot be tolerated and breaks trust. No more Stylish for me. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14135331,6 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Matthias Winkelmann,6 年前Spyware!. Records every keystroke, every website visited, and sends it to their server: https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14131561,6 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Cyberknight,6 年前For all those complaining that Stylish stopped working on FF 61: Mozilla (again) broke up things. "-moz-document" (which never left the "experimental" status) is now blocked to work on remote URL, i.e., it's useless now. Just remove the "-moz-document" lines from the scripts and they will start working again. About the URL restrictions, now Stylish requires the addresses to be input in a specific field on the bottom of the script editing Page. Of course, incorporating "-moz-document" in the script was much easier, dozens of domains could be filtered at once. Now, they have to be entered one by one. On the plus side, Stylish still has the same flexibility regarding domain definitions, including regex rules! On the plus-plus side, it doesn't depend on Mozilla's moods anymore...
开发者回应
发布于 6 年前Thanks Cyberknight! We'll try to upload a fix soon with the 'moz-document' removed by default, as we have it on Chrome. Our Chrome users have been using the 'Specify' field for domains, for quite a while now. As you've mentioned, the regxp pretty much gives you the same flexibly that the moz-document does, without the dependency on FF's changes. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13595994,6 年前Here's the solution to FF 61.0.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51101566/unknown-rule-moz-document-for-stylish-in-firefox-61 - 评分 5 / 5来自 Dave Decker,6 年前Does not work on FF 61.0 -- this is a real bummer for me!
I get also the error with "Unknown @ rule: @-moz-document"
This is the line: @-moz-document domain("wordpress.org") {
...
}
The style is local / custom style.
I am on macOS 10.12.6 Sierra
Is this connect to the release notes where it says Web Extensions are now running in its own process on macOS?
The strange thing is: the very same style loaded from userstyles.org runs perfectly fine still on FF 61.0 - strange.