9 pógódnośenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Nub, för 3 timmar sedanThis extension is a good concept but is managed by the exact people it swore to protect you from
So why am I writing this? Well, Rotector is managed by egotistical staff who think they cannot be wrong about anything at all.
Allow me to start with how the staff acts because they have sent NSFW, literally groomed minors, been homophobic and racist, and even drawn Rule34 of someone named Awful Producer in their own discord server for calling out Rotector's systems for being flawed especially their trap-game system if haven’t seen Awful Producer’s 4 hour video on Rotector you havent i heavily suggest you watch it because this isnt all the staff has done and I will not spend a while on this as there are many things I can list off but really do not want to right now.
So after talking about the staff, how about the extension itself??
Well, once again good concept, bad execution. The extension is AI-first, then human-second, which makes me feel this extension is vibe-coded, but despite that, the staff has quite literally planted evidence on people. A great example of this is, once again Awful Producer, who was called a condo-player and then a past offender multiple times. If you haven't watched his video, please watch it after reading this review if you have a lot of spare time.
This extension has also called people like KreekCraft a literal condo player but had to be corrected quickly by their staff after it got popular on Twitter due to it showing how flawed this extension really is. The response they had to this was 2-3 months faster than their support team responds to live chats, which actually is really surprising how the team behind moderation on this extension is fast only if something that makes them look bad happens.
Rotector also had a "trap game" system that isn't really a "trap game" when it's able to get onto the front page without being banned since it's not an actual condo. Due to these games, you will be called a condo-player for joining just because it was on the front-page. Do I need to say more?
Also, one last thing for this section: in the past Rotector has shown Discord User IDs of absolutely everybody that got a check requested, condo-player or not. Serious privacy violation that likely has also caused witch hunts. I should mention how someone I was friends with even abused this system in-order to stalk me and even add absolutely everybody on my Roblox friends-list with a Discord account; but the weirdest part of this is that Rotector gets your Discord account through Discord Connections, Rover, or Bloxlink. The last two listed are verification bots for Roblox Discord servers mainly. This is against Discord's ToS from what I've heard but I don't make bots and haven't read the bot ToS.
With that said, I want to mention one last thing: the reviews section of the Rotector website. Now why am I mentioning this? Well, it's because they have cut out parts of reviews saying why it's flawed. Please just go to the Rotector website, type /reviews into the URL and look at the review of one with wolf furry profile picture. You may think it's fair but consider that it's on Twitter which means being horny OUTSIDE OF ROBLOX gets you flagged by Rotector.
Also this extension logs your IP which could allow doxxing, which is possible with what the moderation team has done in the past. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót teemsploit, för 4 dagar sedanThey use AI for their detections. In addition to that, they mark victims and incorrectly mark LGBT people and people with age regression, which is a trauma response. They mark any sort of non-standard English text as potentially malicious. I would only trust this to track people who've been in condo servers. Even then, it's a privacy risk. They log your messages on several Discord servers, of which they're not allowed to, as it goes against Discord's TOS. They track their users using any means available to them. And they are just in general unsafe and inaccurate. Please consider using your brain instead of a tool to think for you and what to think about people. And for reference, I have not been marked by this tool. I am simply someone with common sense.
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Panda, för 25 dagar sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót KRISTHEFOUNTAIN, för en månad sedanFalsely flags users based on faulty evidence, stay far away
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót catish, för en månad sedan10% useful, but it is a data scraper, first, the GDPR aurgements are weak, this is the same as little ol' double counter, their ticket itself says it violates gdpr by giving a response time of 3-6 weeks, the GDPR max response time is a month
to be more clear
- GDPR article 12(3) violation (their own words!)
- GDPR Article 12(1) violation, site and privacy policy stating different things about the contact email, " Business inquiries only. For appeals or support, use the live chat." "contact@rotector.com is monitored primarily for business inquiries. We accept rights requests sent here and will respond, but the support chat is faster for verification.",
- most likely GDPR Article 12(2) violation
ill update this once they respond to my ticket, and say how much my rights got violated, or not violated, this review will be deleted once the system has updated to address all data privacy concerns, or till i have been proven wrong - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19943978, för 2 månader sedanI found the tool interesting, but I noticed it's unfairly flagging me. I don't even know how to find a condo.
In practice, the tool's intentions seem good, but it gives a lot of false positives, which makes it seem more like an unjustified witch hunt. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót killerb4810, för 3 månader sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19728860, för 4 månader sedanVibecoded app that relies on AI for detections, which is shown to be unreliable. Should be fully moderated by humans.
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót kde, för 4 månader sedan