Critiques pour Capture de Page Complète — FireShot
Capture de Page Complète — FireShot par TruePage
Avis de TELLALL4ALL
Noté 2 sur 5
par TELLALL4ALL, il y a 4 ans8-2-25: no improvement. Can't deal with large pages and gives an error. Cant snapshot parts of pages except under ffox. SLOW there are no really good snapshot addons that I have seen
2-5-25 same. cannot do partial pages unless in FFox. Slow can't handle large pages and freezes your machine w/out warning or requires you to split the page into segments. slow to load slow to perform
8-31-24: Slow as hell. Only works well with firefox. they must be using Commodore servers with wet string tin can connection to the net.
7-29-24: selecting portion to be copied only works on ffox. won't work on brave. better than awesome screen shot for this purpose WIth awsome it's a unreliable two step process to get a portion of the page to save.
1-17-24: Last time I tried Fireshot screen capture, I noticed some definite improvements: a WARNING when capture webpage is too long and splits the image into pieces for faster save and download. Hope this wasn't a temporary fix because it is a big improvement. Also seems to more reliably give u the option of your partial selection of the page instead of automatically trying to save the entire page. Good going.
10-20-23: ico doesn't appear sometimes so you cannot select image you want to capture, u have to take the defaul full page which implements w/out your input. Freezes computer on large pages requiring hard reboot. Slow. Awesome capture is better program.
9-11-23: kinda buggy. Sometimes freezes computer in windows 8.1 as it cannot handle the cpu/memory load on larger captures. This frequently means a hard reboot: NOT GOOD. Flaky method of selecting portions of the page that often does not work To SLOW to go to save image. Cannot set the path and directory to save captures without having to add the FIRESHOT directory and BS to every file. Other than that it's too damn slow.
7-28-23: Puts big white lines interspersed in the capture image. Often slow and flaky especially with tor. Had to install Awesome screen capture which is working much better. This one works about 50% of the time and is slow and not reliable in it's response to user input. It's ok, just needs to be polished more.
so far works pretty well. PDF is slow. Have only used it recently so the warts may show up later. but so far so good.
2-5-25 same. cannot do partial pages unless in FFox. Slow can't handle large pages and freezes your machine w/out warning or requires you to split the page into segments. slow to load slow to perform
8-31-24: Slow as hell. Only works well with firefox. they must be using Commodore servers with wet string tin can connection to the net.
7-29-24: selecting portion to be copied only works on ffox. won't work on brave. better than awesome screen shot for this purpose WIth awsome it's a unreliable two step process to get a portion of the page to save.
1-17-24: Last time I tried Fireshot screen capture, I noticed some definite improvements: a WARNING when capture webpage is too long and splits the image into pieces for faster save and download. Hope this wasn't a temporary fix because it is a big improvement. Also seems to more reliably give u the option of your partial selection of the page instead of automatically trying to save the entire page. Good going.
10-20-23: ico doesn't appear sometimes so you cannot select image you want to capture, u have to take the defaul full page which implements w/out your input. Freezes computer on large pages requiring hard reboot. Slow. Awesome capture is better program.
9-11-23: kinda buggy. Sometimes freezes computer in windows 8.1 as it cannot handle the cpu/memory load on larger captures. This frequently means a hard reboot: NOT GOOD. Flaky method of selecting portions of the page that often does not work To SLOW to go to save image. Cannot set the path and directory to save captures without having to add the FIRESHOT directory and BS to every file. Other than that it's too damn slow.
7-28-23: Puts big white lines interspersed in the capture image. Often slow and flaky especially with tor. Had to install Awesome screen capture which is working much better. This one works about 50% of the time and is slow and not reliable in it's response to user input. It's ok, just needs to be polished more.
so far works pretty well. PDF is slow. Have only used it recently so the warts may show up later. but so far so good.
2 641 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Karim Elsayad, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Олег, il y a 4 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16620291 de Firefox, il y a 14 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20082668 de Firefox, il y a 19 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par wheatberry, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17841406 de Firefox, il y a un mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par www.H-Med.TV, il y a un moisSimply the best, no BS, plenty of options, works flawlessly. I use it on every browser, and it creates free professional quality results that we're able to capture data and feature the screenshots in our youtube videos (sharing our sources on screen for educational info). Kudos to the dev, fantastic addition required for every browser.
- Noté 1 sur 5par notsalami, il y a un mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13513062 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisIt requires a paid subscription to get proper links in a PDF snapshot. It also gets updated way too frequently, without any new features, but just ask from the user to pay for a subscription. It is not worth it.
- Noté 5 sur 5par lineal, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par lucas, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par dtt, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16923550 de Firefox, il y a 2 moisGave it a try... loved it...
I’ve been a Pro user for many years now.
I’ve never looked for an alternative, because this tool offers everything I need. )) - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19814859 de Firefox, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19958606 de Firefox, il y a 3 moisWorks fine, superb extension, but code blocks are always in dark mode, even if I select Light theme.
What changes in css header to solve that ? - Noté 4 sur 5par bdrum, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14268738 de Firefox, il y a 3 mois