thank you!
(doesn't sound like a reason to rate below 5 stars)

hi, this doesn't sound right.

did you try again? might requires a more specific bug report. (or If this would only be about 180 features and different browser, we might be done for long. Please consider YouTube might change quickly, so not every feature will always work 97% or so is great already)

volume? fan? no!
check this project out on github!

hi! please report this on github

hi! :) you sound like 4.9 stars, given our whole story, many features and nothing better around, (3 is bad, can decrease usage)

hi, thanks, a big reason for Mozilla might/should be, because it is open-source? And we do this since 2012 for 400000 users in chrome, etc. Please consider, contrary to the comment, with 4 stars you are actually shrinking (down-voting) this project. (If you found any bugs: https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=label%3Abug+sort%3Acomments-desc+is%3Aopen )

hi, did already immediately when we noticed our input-field currently doesnt allow unlimited. Firefox sometimes takes several days to review any change. What do you reasonably suggest? (will allow unlimited in the input as said, yet afaik most of all people want between 0.7x and 1.7x and get too stressed from any more, so that a visual slider could represent that. So we shouldn't be responsible for who wants the highscore. Also even if somebody has the superskill to mostly understand a lot still at 4x, that doesnt mean it is a permanent choice for them, because the amount of missed words and misunderstandings assumably rise exponentially near the personal maximum.)

hi! please make a bug report on github https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues/new?assignees=&labels=Bug thank you!
(btw reviews are not supposed to be about a bug(, which might only happen to few people or because of a YouTube update.) This is one of the 3 reason here allowing to flag/remove them. To make it harder our project is an uphill race against this since 11 years and work never ends. There are few extensions as ambitious as this and actually it would deserve 10 stars. (If you expect a majority of features to work for you, then you are expecting more work and more reliability already than most 5-star extensions provide to their single purposes. Yet they are what the rating systems will thus prefer. ) We currently might aim at ~95% of the stuff working for you costing most of our free time. And if we ever get funded might finally hire people and develop even several times faster.)