Firefox Multi-Account Containers 的评价
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 作者: Firefox
7,526 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16161273, 5 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16160749, 5 年前As a non tech person, I appreciate the privacy options of Firefox and was excited to learn how to use the Container. I would give it five stars if there were better instructions on "how to". I haven't even been successful in using the help sections because of not knowing correct terminology. Obviously, I'm talking about very elementary steps, such as how to delete or rename a new container. Even more detail on how to actually put a web site into a new container would be great. ("See Spot run.") I ended up accidentally adding multiple new empty tabs to one of the containers. Here's the difficulty, I grew up with an IBM Selectric typewriter and never took a computer class in college. Lots of my friends are the same way. We just need more detailed steps. Maybe a "Tips for Baby Boomers" section throughout Firefox would be successful. Overall, I'm a huge Firefox (Moxilla) fan and even donate here and there. This is a great organization, and who else works so diligently for net neutrality? Donating to this organization is a privilege ... and a must.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14431287, 5 年前This is the key reason I will never stop using Firefox. Such an underrated feature.
- Don't get me wrong - it's great, especially the recent update that allows you to manage your containers a bit more. BUt for some dumb reason, there's no way to add sites to the list without opening them first - so I have to add support.google.com, mail. google.com, and so on, instead of just typing in https://google.com or *.google.com. I can't for the life of me understand why this feature would be left out. I'll be keeping an eye on this, but I can't use the "Limit to Designated Sites" feature without it.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16158671, 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13613114, 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13898013, 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Étienne Pflieger, 5 年前
- Works excellently. Perfectly solved a need I had. I started using Mozilla over Chrome for various tasks because of how valuable this is as a tool. My only complaint is that there doesn't seem to be a way to reorganize containers, without deleting them and recreating them in the order you want. This becomes troublesome when you have a lot and need to configure their ordering.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12787132, 5 年前For version 7.0.2; The more recent update to this extension made the user experience less enjoyable. Here is what I needed the extension to do:
- quickly open a new tab in a specified container
- reopen an existing tab in a specified container
- set a specific url domain to open in specified container by default
The most recent update adds an additional number of clicks to open a new container tab. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13888653, 5 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15745811, 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16148625, 5 年前This add-on is absurdly useful for Enterprise IT administrators. It enables easy use of dedicated admin identities into separate containers for isolation form normal productivity work, and is particularly useful in contexts like Microsoft 365 / Azure where logging in to the same URLs multiple times in the same browser needs to happen with separate identities that have separate permissions granted.
Multi-Account Containers is a game changer for how I interact with a web browser. It's one of those pieces of technology that once you use it the first time, you simply can't go back to the older means of interaction absent the new features ever again. The degree of quality of life improvement I've received in using this add-on is gigantic, probably the most impactful change since discovering tabbed browsing in the late 1990s. - 评分 4 / 5来自 UnnamedMinecrafter, 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Lakshan Dissanayake, 5 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 patrikstutz, 5 年前Thanks for bringing back the "one click to open new container tab" feature :)
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13080084, 5 年前It was excellent until the latest update. This is so stupid and create extra clicks and avoid shortcut and avoid automation potential. This is a stupid update.