Firefox Multi-Account Containers 的评价
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 作者: Mozilla Firefox
7,387 条评价
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14136969,7 年前Love using this to help keep some semblance of separation between different activities tracking you, especially facebook and amazon. Only thing missing is that it doesn't synchronize across browsers, so I have to re-create the containers and web sites on different machines.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 mqdavid,7 年前Very useful! Though needs better control of settings and easier ways to open tabs in the desired container, switch containers for a tab, etc.. Clunky to add sites one at a time. And desperately needs more granularity: for example, I want Google Maps to open in a separate container than Google Search.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13536961,7 年前Отлично помогает при необходимости одновременной работы под разными аккаунтами с одним сайтом, нет необходимости выходить из одного аккаунта и заходить под другим. Каждый контейнер хранит собственные куки и изолированное окружение.
И надежно, ни разу не испытывал технических проблем из-за этого аддона. - 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14134874,7 年前Should integrate Containerise (manually add sites to specifice containers) and Temporary Containers functionality.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 newyork10023,7 年前This is the greatest thing since sliced bread BUT it is still raw and a work-in-progress (IMHO). Some issues that I've encountered include: Container configuration lost inexplicably from time to time, unable to re-arrange the list of containers (come on!), moving website to another default container requires several steps, requires an another extension (i.e., Switch Container) to switch a page to another container (or if it can it requires jumping through hoops I haven't found).
The idea is great, it will have immense benefit to privacy. It is still raw and has rough edges.
It deserves a better Rating, but the issues are super annoying.
Pair this with Cookie AutoDelete, uMatrix and uBlock Origin.
Keep on, keep on! - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14133933,7 年前Great add-on for privacy, especially together with Temporary Containers add-on.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 SBurnett,7 年前I love the ease and security of using these container tabs. The key is to take the few minutes to find out how they work, set them up so they work for you, and then they're a breeze to use. Thank you, Firefox!
- 评分 5 / 5来自 TANNP tt_tan_9889,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 AJ,7 年前Fantastic idea and works really well. I cannot wait for it to be included in the Firefox base release.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14132831,7 年前amazing! reason why i haven't switched to chrome because of mozilla's focus on privacy. one star removed because this addon should be syncing in the first place with firefox sync so whenever i access firefox in my other devices, the containers i setup should be synced.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14127304,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Mauricio,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13670644,7 年前Indispensable. I can't imagine going back to a browser without containers. If you have more than one account with almost any provider, the experience is much better with containers. Also, check out the "always open in" feature -- very useful if you use containers for isolating sites like Facebook.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 TQ,7 年前Good & Useful.
Looks like Multi-Account + Tab Groups . & developed by Mozilla make me feel better than thirdparty .
But . If when I use this addon as Tab Groups .
It 's very inconvenient to change which container I want show only.
It will be better has a button on [container list] that I can make one be only show.
& even which 2 or more container to show or hide.
need it not go into the [tab list] to set it hide or show than come out one by one..
Now this addon do good job on Multi-Account .
But the TabHiding function is completely wasted cuz extremely inconvenient to use . - 评分 5 / 5来自 Kael Sanders,7 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14125616,7 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Walid Damouny,7 年前The reason I didn't give Containers 5 stars is because I can't Clear History per container, but rather have to delete a container and recreate it. Support for removing history per container seems to be already in the WebExtenions API.