Firefox Multi-Account Containers 的评价
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 作者: Mozilla Firefox
7,369 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13824773,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Kat,3 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17473775,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17473345,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 voshchronos,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Amir,3 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17346590,3 年前設定画面で並べ替えができるようになっているが、その並び順が実際の表示に反映されることはなく、意味不明。
作成した順にしか表示されず、表示順を変えることができないので、場当たり的にコンテナを作成していくと、非常に使いづらくなっていく。 - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17471710,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 mandr,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17470288,3 年前Astoundingly handy add-on. Integrates brilliantly with Mozilla VPN such that I can select a distinct server per container type if I want
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15750198,3 年前
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14149441,3 年前I WANT TO MANUALLY ADD/EDIT URLs DIRECTLY IN THE ADDON "MANAGE SITE LIST" FOR M-RLIN'S SAKE!
HOW HARD CAN THIS FEATURE BE?!
I GET SO MANY REDIRECTS PER SECOND IT JUST BURNS MY CPU AND THEN GET BANNED FOR "TO MANY REQUESTS". - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16865904,3 年前Key reason I use Firefox is for Multi-Account Containers and managing multiple 365 tenants.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Nara,3 年前
- 评分 3 / 5来自 MeleMel,3 年前It was working really well, I have multiple MS and AWS logins and I used this to enable multiple login sessions in different tabs. I don't know if MS have changed how the sessions are identified or an update broke it but it no longer works, I'm back to opening everything in private browsing sessions... Boo :(
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Beachbubba,3 年前Love this extension. However, lately, it seems Google can easily defeat the containers. I can't open more than one Gmail account at a time, unless I open the second Gmail account in a private tab. What's up with that?
- 评分 5 / 5来自 RoeGross,3 年前Hopefully it can be added to choose whether to prompt for a selection page! ! ! !
Do you want to open this website as the identity you specified? - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17466013,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Mikhail,3 年前Works well in cooperation with Cloudflare WARP (proxy mode).
The extension allows for specific selected sites to bypass censorship.
Does not affect all other sites and other network connections. Which is very convenient.
use socks://localhost:port
exactly localhost, not 127.0.0.1 - 评分 5 / 5来自 shalin,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15902071,3 年前This is game changer and not the reason I stay with Firefox. However, when question of Brave comes up, with all that they do, although they are building off chromium code so maybe it is a function that cannot be implemented ( I think it can be but not sure if maybe some limitations that would make it not as effective as what Mozilla can do with having their own engine for their browser ). I am with Firefox regardless. 65% Firefox, 25% Brave, and 10% Chrome, last one to sandbox off google and microsoft from touching other browsers but all it gets are those two companies plus yahoo.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Thierry Insparium,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Nataliia,3 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 PWSmith1,3 年前