Wikiwand - knowledge, with context 的评价
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context 作者: Wikiwand
124 条评价
- 评分 1 / 5来自 winphreak,11 天前I can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12661639,16 天前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17046154,1 个月前Used to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 StephenM,1 个月前If I want AI, I'll either build my own local solution with whatever LLM I want for free or go to a website or use a separate app. Wikiwands' entire existence for being is to make the Wikipedia layout easier to read. Nothing else. Don't remake it ever. AI Wand, NOT Wikiwand. Utter JUNK made by JUNK developers, supported by JUNK people.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Celena,2 个月前This used to be a good extension, which I used for many years across different browsers and devices. Today I've had enough and I'm going to uninstall it.
Before they started remaking it, it was very good. It was essentially a better layout for Wikipedia with not much else to it, but that's why I liked it. It made it clearer to read, easier to use, and just overall felt like a more updated version of Wikipedia's UI. Combined with an ad blocker, it was perfect. However, since the remake, it is worthless. It is so bloated. The majority of the page is taken up with AI stuff, and it wants you to use it constantly. It has made the layout even more confusing - while before I felt like it was very intuitive and more Wikipedia like, now it's just added so much more junk and confusing elements. Wikipedia is way easier to use.
With this latest update, I'm done. I was already getting frustrated with the way pictures were handled. If you clicked on it, there would be various bits of information that covered over part of the picture. Then there was so much blackspace that it wasn't always that much more visible than in the article. You zoom in and it's barely better. Now, I tried to look at the picture it used for the cover image, which no longer shows up in the sidebar as well. I clicked on it, and it was much the same as it used to be, although the information/other pictures below now fades away. Good! However I tried zooming in, because it was still not a big picture. It not only barely zoomed in, but moved the maybe two pixels bigger image around with my cursor. So now I had a very vaguely enlarged picture of some people that bounced around as I tried to exit out of it. Cool!!!!!! Good thing I never use Wikipedia to look at things like art as someone who enjoys art history!!!
The AI is too much, the paywall is too much, the needing to have a separate account for it is too much. And now they have continued to just make the UI worse and worse. I'm done here. I'm so sad that this has gone this way. I'm so disappointed. They had something good and it's useless now. I'd rather use normal Wikipedia, and that's the first time I've said that in many years. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17490856,2 个月前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17143382,3 个月前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 DS,3 个月前Love how Wikiwand used to be an incredibly useful product that made Wikipedia more readable and now it's... "AI-driven" slop garbage that no one wants or asked for. Yet another product "improving" itself right out of usefulness. What a waste.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17984040,3 个月前Shoves GenAI garbage down your throat and the pop ups blocks half the screen. Also sells your data. Just go use something like Modern for Wikipedia
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14774990,3 个月前Great design, but ruined by first having AI shoved in my face and now ads everywhere. Back to classic Wikipedia.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Steedlan,3 个月前Was great, but the recent changes made the UI awful and turn this add-on into a whole cash cow that is against the principles of Wikipedia
- Too much ads, trying to hide bring to a paywall, adding CSS doesn't worth 5$. Even with an adblock the banner background stays.
- They added an AI that is completely useless and only here to surf on the trend of AIs.
- Talking about ads it requires a Wikimand account despite that Wikipedia already have one
We can't accept an add-on that makes money off Wikipedia - 评分 1 / 5来自 Mlse,3 个月前used to be good, then over the years it became incrementally more annoying to use. first all this AI/ account stuff (which was tolerable but annoyinh), paywalls and now ads everywhere. its just not worth it for that marginal improvement over stock wiki.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18160256,3 个月前Was once good, now it is terrible and full of ads.
The ads can be blocked with an ad-blocker but it will leave placeholder boxes. If you're using ublock Origin, you can remove them with the "block Element function" though you will need to tune it to remove them entirely.
Target the 'remove ads' part, and tune the left slider once to the left. Preview shows the results in real-time. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Kioraga,3 个月前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Aphotic,3 个月前now its filled with ads, 1 star.
alternative addon:
Modern for Wikipedia
by Modern Redesigns - 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18749240,3 个月前Wikiwand used to be great. It was a bit annoying when the AI features were shoved in my face, but it was at least tolerable. However, ads have been added recently, and even if I use an ad blocker there are still placeholders breaking the page layout.
RIP Wikiwand. - 评分 1 / 5来自 Mikaïl,3 个月前The AI features are useless, used it once and didn't even answer my question, might as well use ChatGPT for AI
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Richard Yan,3 个月前Used to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 linuxenjoyer,3 个月前It was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Nick,3 个月前I'll stick with Wiki's default look if it means no ads, no random AI stuff, etc. Have been a user for some time, but I guess all good things must come to an end.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18744013,3 个月前I've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.