Bookmarks Organizer 的评价
Bookmarks Organizer 作者: Sören Hentzschel
413 条评价
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firebreathing, 7 年前Great idea, but so many false positives that it makes it worthless. Can only give it one star until bugs fixed. This should have been released as "alpha" version.
开发者回应
发布于 7 年前> This should have been released as "alpha" version
That's not a fair statement. It's not the fault of Bookmarks Organizer. There were some false positive mitigations in Bookmarks Organizer 2.0 but these improvements were not possible before Firefox 59 for technical reasons.
Can you please test again with a current version and re-review? Thanks! - 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13173126, 8 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Hirschferkel, 8 年前It does not work! Whith each runcycle the addon detects new, not working URLs (while some of these work!) and after deleting these new ones occur again.
And it takes ages to scan all links (seems there is no good delay after which not working URLs get aborted)
No control what the addon does. While it works in the background one cannot see if it crashed already.
No chance to interrupt or see intermediate results. No batch processing of links. I would not recommend it.
After having deleted not working URLs and starting the Addon again, the addon detects new entries which it did not durung the first run? So it does not work reliable... be aware. - Very good addon and very good design !
The only lacking features:
- an option to be able to disable the http to https redirect warnings.
Because I use an automatic http to https redirector (extension : Smart HTTPS), so all HTTP urls are in Warning...
- a new functionality to be able to list the empty folders - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12355087, 8 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Vinícius C. Ferreira, 8 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13667370, 8 年前What happens after it identifies all my bookmarks? I want eliminate duplicates, but I don't see any action tab to perform this function??
开发者回应
发布于 2 年前You can edit or delete your duplicates. Can you please test again with a current version and re-review? Thanks! - 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13655280, 8 年前Works very well on my 600+ bookmarks. Will rate 5 stars with whitelisting and ignoring redirects for keyword search URLs. Would also be nice if it differentiated 404s from connection resets.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13263956, 8 年前Brilliant addon. Makes it so easy to correct redirects, remove duplicates and to edit broken links. Have patience it does take a while to finish checking the last few bookmarks.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 voss_joachim, 8 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13127574, 8 年前Working with FF 57.0.2. (64 Bit)
Searching for broken or unavailable links:
The AddOn found many broken links very fast. But the process stopped 1 link before the end and stays there endless. Process doesn't finish.
Searching for duplicate links:
The AddOn doesn't show any duplicate links, but starts to delete links without my confirmation. A look into the FF bookmark backups showed me, that there where really nearly 100 bookmarks deleted.
So I closed the tab of the AddOn hoping this will stop the process. In this moment FF crashed. After starting FF again, ALL my bookmarks were lost.
I hope you understand my rating. I deleted the AddOn for now.
It's a pitty because FF seems not to able to created an integrated bookmark organizer. So i still hope you get this AddOn work bug free.
My best wishes for that project. - 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13580809, 8 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12847925, 8 年前Hi,
I have 1558 BMs and your 'broken bookmarks' did not not complete the scan. So I tried 'missing bookmarks names', which found 4, but the list was most un-useful.
I would hope that clicking on the entry shown in your report would take me to the link in question to determine what to do.
Sorry, but for now, I have removed the add-on. - 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12916690, 8 年前seems OK but it didn't find my "unsorted bookmarks" which number in the thousands. I'm going to remove it and try it again in acouple of months.
开发者回应
发布于 2 年前Bookmarks Organizer finds your unsorted bookmarks as well but only shows the broken one. Can you please test again with a current version and re-review? Thanks!