Bookmarks Organizer 的评价
Bookmarks Organizer 作者: Sören Hentzschel
411 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13147762, 8 年前Works great, and finds http to https redirects :)
A built in bookmark sort function would be nice - 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13084082, 8 年前Thank You for perfect "Bookmarks Organizer" and for the operating answer. I ask You a pardon - at repeated starting was found, what, nevertheless, commands "Edit" and "Delete" appear at induction of the mouse for all items, EXCEPT FOR the first item. (What for with the mouse?). To tell the truth, hand-handling of hundreds items is difficult. It would be nice, if it would be possible to define an main-folder ("Collection"). It for READ-ONLY. And to check other bookmarks on secondariness in relation to a main-folder. Then by the additional command to delete automatically its duplicates from other folders. Forgive my unattention. Thank's.
!!! NOW IT IS NOT ACTUAL : (The script has checked up all mine 2783 bookmarks on doubles. Has detected 681 error. Now a green asterisk with three running points. And doesn't offer any further operations. The naked list in some hundreds items on which there is NO possibility of handling).开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Thank you for your suggestion. Could you please file an issue on GitHub so that I still know in a few days / weeks about your feature request?
Thanks. - 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12849453, 8 年前Im not singling this addon out, literally every "book mark cleaner/organiser" that says it can detect dead pages fails in my experience.
Out of 1945 bookmarks it flagged 628 as warnings, and 10 errors. So, as with every bookmark checker/organiser ive tried I went through and checked manually...kinda defeating the purpose, and found 1 dead link
In this day and age with so many dynamically generated pages, im guessing we cant really expect anything to be 100%, but this was way off. I noticed almost all the warnings URLs were wanting to merely correct http:// to https://, is this really worth alarming a user with a huge number for...I don't think so. The remote website will switch to https:// automatically in most cases anyways. If people are that worried they should install https everywhere....
Post dev feedback reply:
You can mark my review as "invalid feedback - read the description before installing an add-on" all you like, my feedback is valid, and it stands.
And to quote you: "And you can read in the add-on's description that it's a feature of the add-on"
Show me where in the description it says it will want to redirect all http:// sites to https:// ....madness as most links are going to be http:// by default and should be left alone. Certainly no reason to mark them as "warnings" and want to tamper with them.开发者回应
发布于 8 年前http->https redirects are marked as warnings and not as errors, so I don't get your point. That's a FEATURE not a BUG. I know that a lot of users WANT to correct redirects. There was a long beta phase before the official release and there are more than enough users loving this feature. And you can read in the add-on's description that it's a feature of the add-on. If you don't want to see the redirect, you can hide these with ONE CLICK. So you have no reason to complain because of this feature. - This extension looks promising (peculiarly to replace something like Bookmarks Checker, which is now deprecated).
The only important feature which is currently missing is the ability to select only one or more folders (rather than all the bookmarks as currently).
Moreover (although this point is minor), the new brand icon lacks of contrast and becomes virtually invisible with a slightly dark theme.开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Hi,
thank you for your feedback. A multi selection of bookmarks is already planned for a future update.
Regarding the icon, it was tested with the default theme, default compact light theme and with the default compact dark theme from Mozilla. It's good visible on all these themes. But it's not possible to chose an icon which looks great on *all* themes because I can only define one icon for all themes. ;) - 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13071606, 8 年前I run 2 machines 1 Linux Ubuntu 17.04, one 16.04.
The 17.04 ran well, however, it keeps spitting out links as redirects even though they are the same exact address. That's not a big deal, but I had to run it several times to get broken links completely. As for slow internet being a problem...thats not exactly right. I ran the 17.04 machine that had 1400+ bookmarks and it ran pretty quickly (did seem to hang on the last 20 though). When that machine was done I went to the other machine which has same internet connection and 1843 bookmarks and after 15mins it has scanned 15, so its not internet (I verified all was ok with my connection which is very fast). The only difference is that the machine that went fast is fairly new with 16 gigs of memory while the one that doesnt seem to want to get past 15 has only 4 and a slower processor. This tells me there may be a problem hogging memory. I hope this helps the author of this add on since I have been searching for something just like this for a long time. Thank you for your work so far!
Edit: I created a new clean profile with this add on as the only add on with the slow machine and imported my bookmarks and its working, so there must be a compatibility issue with other add ons开发者回应
发布于 8 年前This issue has been fixed in Bookmarks Organizer 2.0. It would be great if you could test (and maybe review) again. Thank you! :) - 评分 5 / 5来自 Bout's Morgan, 8 年前Impressed, it found many bookmarks with http and suggested me https, that was exact !!! Minimum 5 stars.
Bookmarks Organizer 1.2.0 available on June 4.
Nice and fast. Important: Disable NoScript, it causes me some false warnings. - 评分 2 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13056615, 8 年前I use it to scan my 4182 bookmarks for broken link.
In Firefox 53, it is extremely slow and only scan around 3158 in 24 hours.
I force close it and test it on Firefox 55. The scan is extremely fast. It complete 4082 within 5 minutes and up to 4181 within 15 minutes. However, it stop on 4181 and never end. I am waiting for it about 3 hours. The process manager show it is using around 2-10% CPU.
Is this extension can be worked on large amount of bookmarks.开发者回应
发布于 8 年前This issue has been fixed in Bookmarks Organizer 2.0. It would be great if you could test (and maybe review) again. Thank you! :) - 评分 5 / 5来自 fireattack, 8 年前The most important part that it needs to improve IMO is that:
1) A way to disable confirmation (super annoying when you have hundreds of bookmarks to correct)
2) A way to automate some processes. For example, auto correct redirect if it's only from http to https.
Overall, a great add-on that Firefox has been lacking for a long time (since another similar one died around Fx6).
------------
I didn't seem to find a way to disable confirmation?开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Thank you for your feedback!
1) is implemented in Bookmarks Organizer 1.2.0.
2) is planned for a future update. - Scanned through my ~1000 add-ons in like a couple of minutes. Helped me get rid of a dozen dead ones, and fix the redirection of ~150 ones.
A couple of suggestions:
1) Some 'select all', 'select multiple', 'select none' and also checkboxes for each bookmark entry to offer greater control over which bookmarks get changed. For example, out of the 155 re-directions the add-on wanted to fix, I wanted to leave ~10 as it, while let the add-on correct the rest. Clicking 'correct redirect' for each entry would have been tedious, and clicking the 'correct all redirects' wasn't what I wanted. I eventually found out that clicking 'edit' then 'Save' for a bookmark marked as a warning excludes it from the 'correct all redirects' action, and this saved me a lot of time and effort.
2) If the webextensions API allows for this, offer to create backups, or otherwise encourage the user to create them on their own before they use the add-on to make changes. This could help users from shooting themselves in the foot.
3) Every time I clicked edit for a bookmark and then clicked Save, the Keefox popup showed up and tried to 'save the login.' Could this be fixed on your end or is it an issue with Keefox?
4) Once the results of a scan for 'missing bookmark names' show up, scroll down a bit so that the header changed from class `default` to `compact`. This compact mode doesn't feel compact enough. For example, a resolution of 1366x768 gives me a content area of ~630px on Firefox. But even with the header in `.compact` mode, I'm left with the results displaying within a height of ~400px. So (230/630)*100=36% of the content area is being spent in showing the header / footer and that action bar with the drop down and the 'check bookmarks' button. Maybe make the action bar and footer a little smaller, and maybe have (at least the compact mode of) the header change the list ' Number of bookmarks', 'Checked', 'Errors' etc. into a horizontal one instead of a vertical one to save vertical space. There is already a lot of empty space in the compact mode of the header between the star on the left and this list on the right.
Two nitpicks :)
1) The search bar that shows up upon completing a scan says 'Name or URL...' It is not immediately obvious that the text typed into this would filter the results shown below. Maybe something like 'Type name or address to filter results' is better?
2) The fox image on the right in the add-on page is very cute, but the white fur of the fox is too similar to the page background. I couldn't tell what the image was until I right click > View Image'd it. Maybe place it in a circular background for better contrast? This would also help give it the appearance of a button and better convey to users that it is click-able.开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Thank you for your great feedback! I'll check all of these thinks next week and will file tickets on GitHub for all things I want to change.
UPDATE 4.6.:
1. is planned for a future update.
2. a warning is planned for a future update.
3. it's not reproducible
4. it will be a bit better in Bookmarks Organizer 1.2.0.
Nitpick 1. it's changed in Bookmarks Organizier 1.1.0.
Nitpick 2. it's changed in Bookmarks Organizier 1.1.0.